defeature การใช้

Are we really willing to defeature one of our top articles?
I see some minor issues, but not enough to defeature .-- RelHistBuff 16 : 36, 19 September 2007 ( UTC)
*"'Defeature "'any article with multiple dispute and fact tags where the contributors have taken themselves to Arbitration.
Everything else is an obscure ( and controversial, in some cases ! ) point of style or formatting; these are at best minor quibbles, not reasons to defeature an article!
Many of the tags appear to be based on a failure to take the whole article into context; it doesn't make sense to tag a particular sentence with when everything in that whole paragraph is corroborated by a couple of footnotes at the end of the same paragraph . ( I've removed the apparently invalid ones . ) As I said before, there has been a strong consensus built only very recently among those involved in defeaturing not to defeature an article as long as it is clear that there is ongoing work on the article . ( The main problem with FAs is not that they do not meet the FA criteria anymore, but that they don't have anyone actively interested in bringing them up to par.