epanalepsis การใช้

Given the memorable nature of the phrase ( owing to epanalepsis ), as well as its historic significance, the phrase crops up regularly as a headline for articles, editorials, or advertisements on themes of succession or replacement.
Hill also analysed antimetabole, epanalepsis, epizeuxis and " the repetition of a clause with an inversion in the order of its grammatical parts . " His discovery that Act 1 was unique in the amount of all of these rhetorical devices when compared with the rest of the canon led him to conclude that Shakespeare did not write it.
Many similar passages occur in fifteen of the Psalms, 120-134, which also contain an unusual number of epanalepsis, or catch-words, for which Israel Davidson proposed the name " Leitt鰊e . " Thus there is the repetition of " shakan " in Psalm 120 : 5, 6; of " shalom " in verses 6 and 7 of the same psalm; and the catch-word " yishmor " in Psalm 121 : 7, 8 ( all the cases are enumerated in K鰊ig, l . c . p . 302 ).
He uses anadiplosis ( repeating the last word of a clause at the start of the next ) in verse 3 with " . . . skaffa jag barnet; barnet det dog, . . . " and again in verse 4; he uses epanalepsis ( repeating the first word of a clause at its end ) in verse 3, with " Men, min Anna Greta, men ! ", and again in verse 5; and anaphora ( repeating a word at the starts of neighbouring clauses ) in verse 4, " h鋖l den p?hj鋜tat, h鋖l man fyra ! ", and again in verse 5.