capros การใช้

• Hettar may be right that an entry on CapROS is premature.
• CapROS is an active sourceforge project, and it is currently funded by DARPA.
• *The argument for WP : SOFTWARE is stronger, primarily because CapROS isn't shipping yet.
• I also note that Hetar obviously didn't actually " look " at the CapROS website.
• However, this " may " be a reason not to have a stub entry until CapROS actually releases.
• *WP : SPAM : It would be factually inaccurate to fail to mention that the principal force behind CapROS is a company.
• BeRTOS CapROS ChorusOS Contiki Deos DioneOS DNIX talk ) 05 : 33, 17 May 2012 ( UTC ) | other = }}
• Are you imposing the same " notability " criteria to the 38 Wikipedia RTOS articles listed above ( BeRTOS CapROS ChorusOS . . . )?
• To the extent that a brief CapROS entry serves as the endpoint of the EROS work, a " brief " entry is necessary for editorial completeness.
• However, the simple fact that this system is DARPA-funded in the current funding environment is fairly remarkable, and might be construed as a metric of significance for the KeyKOS / EROS / CapROS path of work.
• Software known to be compliant with the Multiboot Specification includes AROS Research Operating System, OpenBIOS, CapROS, freeldr ( bootloader of ReactOS ), GNU Hurd, GRUB 2, Linux, MirBSD bootloader, MINIX 3, NetBSD, illumos, SkyOS, Syllable, and Xen.
• There were nearly 8000 participants at this occasion, as well as the participation of bands, singers, and theaters such as Berry Sakharof, Rami Fortis, Moshik Afia, Carolina, Los Capros, Florentine, Oushak el-Sheikh Imaam, Selfish Shepherd, and others.
• My rationale for adding the entry was ( a ) The EROS work was considered well-motivated by a broad number of people, ( b ) The current EROS development path is proceeding with CapROS, so if the work is worth mentioning CapROS needs to be dealt with for editorial completeness . ( c ) The desire to avoid proliferation of articles is overridden in this case by the importance of not misrepresenting credit.
• My rationale for adding the entry was ( a ) The EROS work was considered well-motivated by a broad number of people, ( b ) The current EROS development path is proceeding with CapROS, so if the work is worth mentioning CapROS needs to be dealt with for editorial completeness . ( c ) The desire to avoid proliferation of articles is overridden in this case by the importance of not misrepresenting credit.