chiliagon การใช้

• Thus the regular chiliagon is not a constructible polygon.
• The example of a chiliagon is also referenced by other philosophers, such as Immanuel Kant.
• Inspired by Descartes's chiliagon example, Roderick Chisholm and other 20th-century philosophers have used similar examples to make similar points.
• Henri Poincar?uses the chiliagon as evidence that " intuition is not necessarily founded on the evidence of the senses " because " we can not represent to ourselves a chiliagon, and yet we reason by intuition on polygons in general, which include the chiliagon as a particular case ."
• Henri Poincar?uses the chiliagon as evidence that " intuition is not necessarily founded on the evidence of the senses " because " we can not represent to ourselves a chiliagon, and yet we reason by intuition on polygons in general, which include the chiliagon as a particular case ."
• Henri Poincar?uses the chiliagon as evidence that " intuition is not necessarily founded on the evidence of the senses " because " we can not represent to ourselves a chiliagon, and yet we reason by intuition on polygons in general, which include the chiliagon as a particular case ."
• There are a few legitimate references ( e . g . in textbook exercises, and the ref noted above ) in Google Books, but it's very thin, in contrast to chiliagon, which really "'is "'notable .-- talk ) 11 : 16, 14 February 2012 ( UTC)
• David Hume points out that it is " impossible for the eye to determine the angles of a chiliagon to be equal to 1996 right angles, or make any conjecture, that approaches this proportion . " Gottfried Leibniz comments on a use of the chiliagon by John Locke, noting that one can have an idea of the polygon without having an image of it, and thus distinguishing ideas from images.
• David Hume points out that it is " impossible for the eye to determine the angles of a chiliagon to be equal to 1996 right angles, or make any conjecture, that approaches this proportion . " Gottfried Leibniz comments on a use of the chiliagon by John Locke, noting that one can have an idea of the polygon without having an image of it, and thus distinguishing ideas from images.
• I think that for these names we ought to check how many sources independently derive them the same way : certainly you would get lots of sources for 1 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 100, 1000, and 10000, but I'm not sure about 10 6, given that there are only two sources given and most of the philosophy refs in that book just refer to it as a polygon with a million sides, or some other descriptive phrase . ( Whereas the philosophy refs do use " chiliagon " and " myriagon " for the 1000-gon and 10000-gon respectively . ) talk ) 15 : 02, 15 February 2015 ( UTC)