เข้าสู่ระบบ สมัครสมาชิก

cnty การใช้

ประโยคมือถือ
  • This dicta inspired " Oneida Indian Nation of N . Y . State v . Oneida Cnty . " ( 1974 ) [ " " Oneida I " " ], where the Supreme Court held that there was federal subject-matter jurisdiction for Indian land claims based upon aboriginal title and violations of the Nonintercourse Act.
  • In " Oneida Cnty . v . Oneida Indian Nation of N . Y . State " ( 1984 ) [ " " Oneida II " " ], the Supreme Court held that tribes have a federal common law cause of action, not pre-empted by the Nonintercourse Act, for possessory land claims based upon aboriginal title; the court also rejected the following affirmative defenses : limitations, abatement, ratification or nonjusticiability.