declensional การใช้

• This effectively means the loss of a declensional case marker.
• Some of the nouns occur in another declensional type only in one case.
• A very small group of nouns have declensional patterns that suggest mixed gender characteristics.
• Part of this is because the crm114 language syntax is not positional, but declensional.
• Originally, adjectives in Proto-Indo-European followed the same declensional classes as nouns.
• In them, there is a high but not absolute correlation between grammatical gender and declensional class.
• Every declensional class has a small subset of nouns following the so-called " mobile accent " paradigm.
• The first and second person pronouns are very irregular, and do not fit neatly into any other declensional category.
• This word combines the two declensional paradigms and is lay
  
  lin, lay
  
  liya, and, and al-lay
  
  liya respectively.
• I've learnt that some languages like Sanskrit are declensional to the point that word order is totally free.
• In general, weak nouns are easier than strong nouns, since they had begun to lose their declensional system.
• If a noun is both and diptotic, then it is completely invariable for case and belongs to declensional paradigm eight.
• It is always indicated by the declensional suffix ( and some morphophonemic modifications to the root resulting from addition of the suffix ).
• In terms of declensional and conjugational endings, the two languages have tended to innovate in divergent ways, with neither clearly simpler than the other.
• Foreign nouns that are fairly recent loans arguably fall into a third gender class ( discussed by Black ), if considered in terms of their declensional pattern.
• Some of the declensional types include few words, for example there are only two words of the third accentuation pattern in the fifth declension : sk
  n鵶 and liet鵶.
• In modern Slovene, they are best treated as irregular because there are relatively few of them, but the declensional patterns are usually still regular enough to consider them as cohesive subclasses.
• The number of words ( Dictionary of contemporary Lithuanian language / Dabartin
  s Lietuvis
  kalbos ~
  odynas; the fourth issue, 2000 ) of the declensional patterns can be checked in the section above.
• Word-final yers, which were abundant including in declensional patterns were reduced in length to ultrashort, or " weak ", variants ( /-
  / and / m
  / ).
• The major difference between the two classes are 1 ) semantic-Proper Nominals have pronominal characteristics, and, 2 ) declensional, for example Proper Nominals have one locative case rather than the three of Common Nominals.