echopraxia การใช้

• If the imitative behavior continues beyond infanthood, it may be considered echopraxia.
• Echopraxia may be more easily distinguished in older individuals, because their behaviors in relation to prior behaviors can be differentiated.
• Before that, it is not possible to diagnose echopraxia, because it is difficult to differentiate between imitative learning and automatic imitation.
• The Chinese room argument is a central concept in Blindsight " and ( to a lesser extent ) " Echopraxia ".
• Symptoms include a clouding of consciousness, somatic conversion symptoms, confusion, stress, loss of personal identity, echolalia, and echopraxia.
• The Necker cube is used to illustrate how vampires in the science fiction novels " Blindsight " and " Echopraxia " have superior pattern recognition skills.
• Automatic behavior is occasionally present in healthy adults ( for example, when a person observes someone yawning, he or she may do the same ); these behaviors are not considered echopraxia.
• Examples of complex motor tics are pulling at clothes, touching people, touching objects, echopraxia ( repeating or imitating another person's actions ) and copropraxia ( involuntarily performing obscene or forbidden gestures ).
• His novel " boobie prize . " " Echopraxia " ( 2014 ) is a " sidequel " about events happening on Earth and elsewhere concurrent with the events in " Blindsight ".
• In many cases, I had to remove their entire sandbox ( take the example of echopraxia, where they were actually writing about schizophrenia in the wrong article, and schizophrenia is already a comprehensive FA ).
• In one painfully hilarious moment, an expert witness for the prosecution, Dr . Rampling, suffers from three neurological conditions, coprolalia, copropraxia and echopraxia, which make her shout obscenities, grab her own breasts and mimic her questioners as she testifies, all unconsciously.
• Similar across every student-edited article I've encountered-- the article improvement between first and last student edit is because I had to invest time to keep the articles clean, which would be fine if they were typically articles worthy of the time invested in them ( in terms of importance and page views )-- instead, they are obscure topics like klazomania, which sound sexy and fun ( oh, compulsive shouting, cool, let's edit that ! ) Klazomania was last term-- same thing this term with echopraxia where the students are just " determined " to write about schizophrenia in the echopraxia article, Autism spectrum disorders in the media ( which was unnecessarily spun off from another article and has taken tons of edits to keep clean and has added nothing new of substance, in fact, has copied text from other articles ), Bipolar disorder not otherwise specified ( would my time not be better spent cleaning up bipolar rather than one obscure offshoot that no one reads ? ), separation anxiety disorder, and then the infamous Internet relationship where the student repeatedly plagiarized but the professor couldn't be bothered to follow student contribs where the copyvio removed is clear in edit summaries ( is it my job to do the prof's grading ? ? ? )-- when these articles are evaluated as some sort of improvement between first and last student edit, how are all of my interim edits to clean up and remove copyvio accounted for?
• Similar across every student-edited article I've encountered-- the article improvement between first and last student edit is because I had to invest time to keep the articles clean, which would be fine if they were typically articles worthy of the time invested in them ( in terms of importance and page views )-- instead, they are obscure topics like klazomania, which sound sexy and fun ( oh, compulsive shouting, cool, let's edit that ! ) Klazomania was last term-- same thing this term with echopraxia where the students are just " determined " to write about schizophrenia in the echopraxia article, Autism spectrum disorders in the media ( which was unnecessarily spun off from another article and has taken tons of edits to keep clean and has added nothing new of substance, in fact, has copied text from other articles ), Bipolar disorder not otherwise specified ( would my time not be better spent cleaning up bipolar rather than one obscure offshoot that no one reads ? ), separation anxiety disorder, and then the infamous Internet relationship where the student repeatedly plagiarized but the professor couldn't be bothered to follow student contribs where the copyvio removed is clear in edit summaries ( is it my job to do the prof's grading ? ? ? )-- when these articles are evaluated as some sort of improvement between first and last student edit, how are all of my interim edits to clean up and remove copyvio accounted for?