interactant การใช้

• The'interactant', meanwhile, dialogues face-to-face with the shadower.
• EVT requires determining whether one interactant's behavior change qualifies as a positive or negative violation.
• After the conversation ended, observers rated each interactant in terms of the amount of causal influence he or she exerted during the exchange.
• A third protein identified by yeast two-hybrid screening as a physical interactant of FAM46B is PEPP2, a paired-like homeobox protein.
• Questions typically asked during a dialogical analysis include : What does each interactant think about themselves, the other and what the other thinks of them?
• Further, in a study on SUMOylation in response to accumulated misfolded proteins and ER stress found QSER1 to be a SUMO interactant in this situation.
• Interactant variables are the traits of those persons involved in the communication, such as sex, attractiveness, race, culture, status, and age.
• This is related to the # Arms race ), where two organisms co-evolve to overcome each other but each fails to progress relative to the other interactant.
• When the theory was first proposed, EVT identified three factors which influence a person's expectations : Interactant variables, environmental variables, and variables related to the nature of the interaction.
• However, if the person's actual behavior is more negative, than the person will diverge with the interactant's behavior in the hopes that they may reciprocate that behavior back.
• In the specific case of interpersonal communication, the Expectancy Violation Theory ( EVT ) says that three factors influence a person's expectations : interactant variables, environmental variables, and variables related to the nature of the interaction or environmental variables.
• If successful, the nature of the interaction gives rise to a phenomenon Milgram referred to as the " cyranic illusion, " whereby the interactant fails to detect that their interlocutor is merely a speech shadower repeating the words of a remote source.
• If the actual behavior of an interactant is more positive than a person's prediction ( much like a positive violation in EVT ) of the interactant's IP, then the person will converge their behavior to the interactant's.
• If the actual behavior of an interactant is more positive than a person's prediction ( much like a positive violation in EVT ) of the interactant's IP, then the person will converge their behavior to the interactant's.
• If the actual behavior of an interactant is more positive than a person's prediction ( much like a positive violation in EVT ) of the interactant's IP, then the person will converge their behavior to the interactant's.
• This phenomenon occurs in a variety of different contexts : treating oneself as a social interactant ( talking to oneself ), imagining others are present ( either who are currently existent or have died ), envisioning future social interactions, and personifying animals or inanimate objects ( talking to pets ).
• IAT predicts that if at any point, either interactant wants it to continue to be stable, IP does not equal A then, one of the interactants changes their IP . This change is both to minimize the gap between IP and A, and by changing their IP, they hope that their partner will notice the difference between IP and A, thus changing A . Burgoon et al ., describes this as a " Follow the Leader " entrainment principle.
• Within the realm of involvement and immediacy changes, it predicts that ( a ) unexpected positive behavior by a positively valenced interactant will produce reciprocal behavior, ( b ) unexpected negative behavior by a positively valenced interactant will produce compensatory behavior, ( c ) unexpected negative behavior by a negatively valenced interactant will produce reciprocal negative behavior, and ( d ) unexpected positive behavior by a negatively valenced interactant may produce either reciprocal or compensatory behavior, depending on which is more salient  the valence of the behavior or the valence of the interactant.
• Within the realm of involvement and immediacy changes, it predicts that ( a ) unexpected positive behavior by a positively valenced interactant will produce reciprocal behavior, ( b ) unexpected negative behavior by a positively valenced interactant will produce compensatory behavior, ( c ) unexpected negative behavior by a negatively valenced interactant will produce reciprocal negative behavior, and ( d ) unexpected positive behavior by a negatively valenced interactant may produce either reciprocal or compensatory behavior, depending on which is more salient  the valence of the behavior or the valence of the interactant.
• Within the realm of involvement and immediacy changes, it predicts that ( a ) unexpected positive behavior by a positively valenced interactant will produce reciprocal behavior, ( b ) unexpected negative behavior by a positively valenced interactant will produce compensatory behavior, ( c ) unexpected negative behavior by a negatively valenced interactant will produce reciprocal negative behavior, and ( d ) unexpected positive behavior by a negatively valenced interactant may produce either reciprocal or compensatory behavior, depending on which is more salient  the valence of the behavior or the valence of the interactant.