mahound การใช้

• It also refers to Mohammed as Mahound, a demon in Christian morality plays.
• This user User : Paul Barlow keeps inserting non-biblical content into the Mahound article.
• Mahound is based on the biblical literature that describes the Christian view and this user keeps inserting another text from another religon.
• The Mahound is based on terms found in the biblical literature .-- talk ) 17 : 26, 3 August 2008 ( UTC)
• It is a transformed re-narration of the life of Muhammad ( called " Mahound " or " the Messenger " in the novel ) in Mecca ( " Jahiliyyah " ).
• The name appears in various medieval mystery plays, in which Mahound is sometimes portrayed as a generic " pagan " god worshipped by villains such as Herod and the Pharaoh of the Exodus.
• More recently, Salman Rushdie, in his novel " The Satanic Verses ", chose the name Mahound to refer to Muhammad as he appears in one character's dreams.
• :: : Just on a point of interest, " Mahound " does not appear in the Bible, so I am unsure what Alley30 is on about . talk ) 17 : 41, 3 August 2008 ( UTC)
• One play depicts both Herod the Great and his son Herod Antipas as worshipping Mahound, while in another play Pharaoh encourages the Egyptians to pursue the Israelites into the Red Sea with the words : " Heave up you hearts ay to Mahound ".
• One play depicts both Herod the Great and his son Herod Antipas as worshipping Mahound, while in another play Pharaoh encourages the Egyptians to pursue the Israelites into the Red Sea with the words : " Heave up you hearts ay to Mahound ".
• In " Lepanto, " it is ironically Mahound himself, not Don John or Cervantes, who makes the clearest assessment of his Christian enemy's motivation and values : " It is he that saith not'Kismet'; it is he that knows not Fate ".
• That belongs in the Mahamada article, not Mahound that defines a biblical term, further the Mahamada article does not even state that and the source the user provided for the text has no mention of Muhammad .-- talk ) 17 : 35, 3 August 2008 ( UTC)
• Well, not only was I wrong but BostonMA was the soul of patience [ http : / / en . wikipedia . org / w / index . php ? title = Talk : Mahound & diff = next & oldid = 82869436, calmly correcting me and suggesting compromise and solutions for the betterment of Wikipedia.
• "The Satanic Verses " was published by Viking Penguin on 26 September 1988 in the UK, and on 22 February in the US . According to one observer, " almost all the British book reviewers " were unaware of the book's connection to Islam because Rushdie has used the name Mahound instead of Muhammad for his chapter on Islam.
• According to McRoy ( 2007 ), other controversial elements included the use of the name Mahound, said to be a derogatory term for Muhammad used by the English during the Crusades; the use of the term Jahilia, denoting the'time of ignorance'before Islam, for the holy city of Mecca; the use of the name of the the Mothers of all Believers '.
• Further more, Boston kept this up for the rest of the AfD, being reasonable incisive [ http : / / en . wikipedia . org / w / index . php ? title = Wikipedia : Articles _ for _ deletion / Mahound & diff = next & oldid = 83055803, doing research and generally ensuring that a potentially devisive AfD was turned into one of the best discussions about an article I've ever seen.
• I took the article to AfD-not quite ready to back down but sufficiently in awe of Boston's good sense to say so in the nom More reasonableness followed from Boston [ http : / / en . wikipedia . org / w / index . php ? title = Wikipedia : Articles _ for _ deletion / Mahound & diff = next & oldid = 82872567 showing a grasp of Wikipedia policy and conventions that cannot help but please.
• Daniel Pipes identified other more general issues in the book likely to have angered pious Muslims : A complaint in the book by one of Mahound's companions : " rules about every damn thing, if a man farts let him turn his face to the wind, a rule about which hand to use for the purpose of cleaning one's behind . . . ", which was said to mix up " Islamic law with its opposite and with the author's whimsy "; A complaint by one of the characters about communal violence in India : " Fact is, religious faith, which encodes the highest aspirations of human race, is now, in our country, the servant of lowest instincts, and God is the creature of evil ".
• "QC, rehearsed the arguments and replies made when 13 Muslim barristers had lodged a formal indictment against Rushdie for the crime of blasphemous libel : it was said that God was described in the book as " the Destroyer of Man ", yet he is described as such in the Old Testament and the Book of Revelation, especially of men who are unbelievers or enemies of the Jews; that the book contained criticisms of the prophet Abraham, yet the Islamic, Christian and Jewish traditions themselves see Abraham as not without fault and deserving of criticism; that Rushdie referred to Mohammed as " Mahound ", a conjurer, a magician and a false prophet, yet these remarks are made by a drunken apostate, a character with whom neither reader nor author has any sympathy; that the book insults the wives of the Prophet by having whores use their names, yet the wives are explicitly said to be chaste and the adoption of their names by whores is to symbolise the corruption of the city then being described ( perhaps symbolising Mecca in its pre-Islamic state ); that the book vilified the companions of the Prophet, calling them " bums from Persia " and " clowns ", yet the character saying this is a hack poet hired to write propaganda against the Prophet and does not reflect the author's beliefs; that the book criticised Islam for having too many rules and seeking to control every aspect of life, yet while characters in the book do make such remarks these cannot constitute blasphemy since they do not vilify God or the Prophet.