เข้าสู่ระบบ สมัครสมาชิก

molinist การใช้

ประโยคมือถือ
  • This is obviously fallacious according to the Molinist.
  • However, the Molinist can embrace both God's sovereignty and human free choice.
  • Jansenist writers, including Blaise Pascal, frequently criticized the Molinist position which placed more emphasis on free will.
  • The Molinist believes that God, using his middle knowledge and foreknowledge, surveyed all possible worlds and then actualized a particular one.
  • Fleury was appointed confessor to the young King Louis XV in 1716, because, as the duke of Orleans said, he was neither Jansenist nor Molinist, nor Ultramontanist, but Catholic.
  • In the Molinist controversy between Dominicans and Jesuits Lemos was given the responsibility, along with Diego 羖varez, of representing the Dominican Order in debates before Pope Clement VIII and Pope Paul V.
  • Kenneth Keathley, author of " Salvation and Sovereignty : A Molinist Approach ", states that Molinists argue that God perfectly accomplishes His will in the lives of genuinely free creatures through the use of His omniscience.
  • As the Bishop and Count of Toul, Blouet de Camilly found himself in the controversy over Jansenism, which threatened to send the Catholic Church of France into a Molinist, he tried to stay in the middle throughout the furore.
  • The Molinist claims that in this example, God knows what His free creatures would choose under hypothetical circumstances, namely that the Sodomites would have responded in such a way that Sodom would still have been in existence in Jesus'day.
  • An example would be, " If Bob were in Tahiti he would freely choose to go swimming instead of sunbathing . " The Molinist claims that even if Bob is never in Tahiti, God can still know whether Bob would go swimming or sunbathing.
  • The Molinist position, exemplified by Craig in the preceding paragraph, is 1 ) to argue this requires potentially heretical arguments relating to a limitation of divine omniscience, and 2 ) that a choice can be free, and yet the way in which an agent will make that choice can be known apart from observation of the actualized choice itself ( and even apart from the actualization of the choice entirely ).