phenomenalist การใช้

• After gaining his membership, Lovering reinvented himself as " The Scientific Phenomenalist ".
• Another criticism is that the phenomenalist can give no satisfactory explanation of the permanent possibilities of experience.
• Some schools such as the Sarvastivadins explained perception as a type of phenomenalist realism while others such as the Sautrantikas preferred representationalism and held that we only perceive objects indirectly.
• 20th century American philosopher Arthur Danto asserted that " a phenomenalist, believ [ es ] that whatever is finally meaningful can be expressed in terms of our own [ sense ] experience . ".
• He claimed that " The phenomenalist really is committed to the most radical kind of empiricism : For him reference to objects is always finally a reference to sense-experience . . . ."
• The phenomenalist phase of post-Humean empiricism ended by the 1940s, for by that time it had become obvious that statements about physical things could not be translated into statements about actual and possible sense data.
• Indeed, Boring himself subscribed to the phenomenalist creed, attempting to reconcile it with an identity theory and this resulted in a " reductio ad absurdum " of the identity theory, since brain states would have turned out, on this analysis, to be identical to colors, shapes, tones and other sensory experiences.
• To the phenomenalist, objects of any kind must be related to experience . " John Stuart Mill once spoke of physical objects as but the'permanent possibility of experience'and this, by and large, is what the phenomenalist exploits : All we can mean, in talking about physical objects & mdash; or nonphysical objects, if there are any & mdash; is what experiences we would have in dealing with them . . . . " However, phenomenalism is based on mental operations.
• To the phenomenalist, objects of any kind must be related to experience . " John Stuart Mill once spoke of physical objects as but the'permanent possibility of experience'and this, by and large, is what the phenomenalist exploits : All we can mean, in talking about physical objects & mdash; or nonphysical objects, if there are any & mdash; is what experiences we would have in dealing with them . . . . " However, phenomenalism is based on mental operations.