substantialism การใช้

• The " hole argument " offered by John Earman is a powerful argument against manifold substantialism.
• In the last two letters, he founds a metaphysical materialism grounded in a critique of monist substantialism.
• The Yog
  
  c
  
  rins criticized the M
  
  dhyamikas for tending towards nihilism, while the M
  
  dhyamikas criticized the Yog
  
  c
  
  rins for tending towards substantialism.
• In " Part II : Phenomenology and Substantialism " Gralnick recorded the objects used before melting them down by casting them in plaster.
• These considerations show that, since substantialism allows the construction of holes, that the universe must, on that view, be indeterministic.
• Wagar once stated that what he called " Substantialism " in the book was his recasting of the ideas of Jean Jaur鑣.
• Which, Earman argues, is a case against substantialism, as the case between determinism or indeterminism should be a question of physics, not of our commitment to substantialism.
• Which, Earman argues, is a case against substantialism, as the case between determinism or indeterminism should be a question of physics, not of our commitment to substantialism.
• Central to the philosophy of the " world Commonwealth Government " which rises after the " Catastrophe " is what Wagar calls " Substantialism ".
• Both the M
  
  dhyamikas and the Yog
  
  c
  
  rins saw themselves as preserving the Buddhist Middle Way between the extremes of nihilism ( everything as unreal ) and substantialism ( substantial entities existing ).
• The Theravadins too refuted the Sarv
  
  stiv
  
  dins and Sautr
  
  ntikins ( and followers of other schools ) on the grounds that their theories were in conflict with the non-substantialism of the canon.
• Sociologist Christian Smith states in " What is a Person ? " that he rejects Emirbayer's position that substantialism and relationalism represent fundamentally different points of view, rather:
• This theory, also associated with the Yoga school, is the systematic unfolding of Udalaka Aruni s ( Chandogya Upanishad VI . i . 4-5 )'substantialism'and'eternalism '.
• Some philosophers of physics take the argument to raise a problem for " manifold substantialism ", a doctrine that the manifold of events in spacetime is a " substance " which exists independently of the matter within it.
• As synthetic philosopher and dialectician he tries to merge primary philosophic doctrines : in gnoseology, empirism and rationalism; in metaphysics, monadology and substantialism; in ontology and methodology, dialectics and metaphysics ( in Hegel's sense ); science and religion, science and speculation and others.
• While substantivalism ( similar to substantialism in philosophy ) tends to view individuals ( or other social objects ) as self-subsistent or self-acting entities, relationalism underscores that practices constitute individuals, and that all action is always trans-action : always with implication transcending the momentary intent.
• It basically involved accepting that these two solutions are physically equivalent by claiming that how the metric is localized over the spacetime manifold is physically irrelevant and that individual spacetime points defined in terms of spacetime coordinates have no physical meaning in and of themselves ( this is the source of the problem for manifold substantialism ).
• Inspired by ( amongst others ) Ernst Cassirer's functional perspective on the history of ideas and philosophy, and the concomitant view of a rearrangement within the spiritual relationships specific to an epoch, Blumenberg rejects the substantialism of historical continuity  fundamental to the so-called'theorem of secularization'; the Modern age in his view represents an independent epoch opposed to Antiquity and the Middle Ages by a rehabilitation of human curiosity in reaction to theological absolutism . " Hans Blumenberg targets Karl L鰓ith's argument that progress is the secularization of Hebrew and Christian beliefs and argues to the contrary that the modern age, including its belief in progress, grew out of a new secular self-affirmation of culture against the Christian tradition . " Wolfhart Pannenberg, a student of L鰓ith, has continued the debate against Blumenberg.