vapourware การใช้

• Despite a whole slew of references, this organisation is vapourware.
• But " something " should not be hanging around for a vapourware new namespace.
• WP : NOTCRYSTAL applies to this vapourware peddler.
• :Here's a solution that will work now instead of waiting for a potentially vapourware new namespace.
• "Today, we'll give you some vapourware announcements and outright lies, " the subhead added.
• In software patois, " vapourware " means products that have been announced but that still don't exist.
• This is NOT VAPOURWARE . This is a product worth Billions of dollars in sales potential ( currently selling in the millions of dollars ).
• Unfortunately the article validation feature of MediaWiki 1.5 which might move us in this direction seems to be vapourware for the time being.
• Mera-Elzab made two versions of Meritum and a third was announced and exhibited in a computer fair in 1986, but was never produced ( " vapourware " ).
• The rules as applied in this particular category make Wikipedia promote large vendors like Microsoft and give extreme attention to every announcement of vapourware or software that simply doesn't work properly and is beta tested on the unsuspecting public.
• In the computer industry, "'vaporware "'or "'vapourware "'is a product, typically computer hardware or software, that is announced to the general public but is never actually manufactured nor officially cancelled.
• First of all both entries above have not addressed the point that this niche software for mostly the public / academic sector, these institutions do not issue press releases by marketing which then becomes very quotable, neither is it in the hire-a-journalist-by-the-article as it happens with outfits owned by gawker media et al, the endgadgets etc of this world that are basically a legitimisation source for payment and which seems to be enough to have even vapourware listed on wikipedia.
• I've seen this same ideology in religious extremeists ( Christianity has to ask itself : Are we following a vapourware promise because Jesus'return never happened, even though the scriptures imply it would happen around the time of the Roman destruction of the Jewish temple ), with open source advocates ( Certain software development, such as ease of use and games, works much better under a proprietary model-- that said, I'm posting this using Firefox ), and with Wikipedia advocates ( there is a certain myth here that any article's inaccuracies will magically disapear when an expert looks at a given article.