เข้าสู่ระบบ สมัครสมาชิก

apl2 การใช้

ประโยคมือถือ
  • This product is a continuation of APL2 offered for IBM mainframes.
  • "APL2 " for IBM mainframe computers is still available.
  • GNU APL is a free implementation of ISO Standard 13751 and hence similar to APL2.
  • Another example is the GRAPHPAK workspace supplied with IBM's APL, then APL2.
  • IBM offers a version of IBM APL2 for IBM AIX, Linux, Sun Solaris and Windows systems.
  • Here is an APL idioms list, an IBM APL2 idioms list here and Finnish APL idiom library here.
  • Even today, most APL vendors or their users cite APL2 compatibility, as a selling point for those products.
  • The APL2 Workstation edition ( Windows, OS / 2, AIX, Linux, and Solaris ) followed much later in the early 1990s.
  • There are several APL version permutations across various APL implementations, particularly differences between IBM's APL2 and APL2000's APL + versions.
  • Work on APL2 proceeded intermittently for 15 years, NARS and APL2 differed in fundamental respects from dictionary APL, and differed from each other.
  • Work on APL2 proceeded intermittently for 15 years, NARS and APL2 differed in fundamental respects from dictionary APL, and differed from each other.
  • Following APL . SV, the IBM VS APL and APL2 program products also supported shared variables, as well as the IBM 5100 line of computers.
  • As other vendors were busy developing APL interpreters for new hardware, notably Unix-based microcomputers, APL2 was almost always the standard chosen for new APL interpreter developments.
  • IBM APL2 was arguably the most influential APL system, which provided a solid implementation standard for the next set of extensions to the language, focusing on nested arrays.
  • The core language is closely modelled on IBM's APL2 with various enhancements . " APLX " includes close integration with . NET, R . Effective July 11, 2016, MicroAPL withdrew APLX from commercial sale.
  • Unlike most other APL interpreters, Kenneth E . Iverson had some influence in the way nested arrays were implemented in Sharp APL and SAX . Nearly all other APL implementations followed the course set by IBM with APL2, thus some important details in Sharp APL differ from other implementations.
  • Although Dyalog APL included an implementation of shared variables for communication with the now-deprecated Microsoft Windows Dynamic Data Exchange ( DDE ), it is interesting to note that only IBM continued to use Shared Variables as a means to supply new features to their versions of the APL2 language for non-mainframe computers.