discriminability การใช้

• Discriminability analyses identified brain regions that were significantly, differentially active when contrasting pairs of discrete emotions.
• After the categorization has been learned, similarity or discriminability are tested again, and compared against the untrained data.
• The typical learned CP experiment would be the following : A set of stimuli is tested ( usually in pairs ) for similarity or discriminability.
• Thus, discriminability between the five discrete emotion categories was assessed on a more precise spatial scale than what had been accomplished in prior meta-analyses.
• In the case of discriminability, same / different judgments and signal detection analysis might be used to estimate the pairwise discriminability of a set of stimuli.
• In the case of discriminability, same / different judgments and signal detection analysis might be used to estimate the pairwise discriminability of a set of stimuli.
• Pictures have distinctive features that enable to distinguish pictures from words and such discriminability increase memory ability in comparison with verbal cues ( Jenkins, Neale & Deno, 19 67 ).
• Discriminability was then assessed by pair-wise contrasts of individual emotion ALE maps ( for example, fear ALE map vs . anger ALE map; fear ALE map vs . disgust map ) across all basic emotions pairings.
• The baseline might be the actual size of the physical differences involved, or, in the case of learned CP, it might be the perceived similarity or discriminability within and between categories before the categories were learned, compared to after.
• It  integrate [ s ] new ideas with basically similar concepts in cognitive structure, as well as increase [ s ] discriminability between new and existing ideas which are essentially different but confusably similar ( Ausubel, 1968, p . 149 ).
• Based on the work of Osman and colleagues we also know that in the Go / No-Go paradigm, feature discriminability ( e . g ., discriminate between V and 5, easy ) or between l and 1 ( lowercase l and the number 1, difficult ) affects onset of the LRP difference between the " Go " and " No-Go " ( response execution ), but not LRP onset ( response preparation ).
• This pattern of clear discriminability between emotion categories was in fact rare, with a number of other patterns occurring in limbic regions ( including amydala, hippocampus, hypothalamus, and orbitofrontal cortex ), paralimbic regions ( including subcallosal cingulate, medial prefrontal cortex, anterior cingulate cortex, posterior cingulate cortex, insula, and temporal pole ), and uni / heteromodal regions ( including lateral prefrontal cortex, primary sensorimotor cortex, temporal cortex, cerebellum, and brainstem ).